A friendly note to Chelsea Clinton: When referring to something as “horrifying,” “sick” or “awful,” it helps if you have a father who isn’t an accused rapist.
The former first daughter found that out the hard way on Twitter when she tried to register her disgust at the possible deportation of an illegal immigrant and ended up drawing the unwanted attention of Juanita Broaddrick, the woman who has long maintained Chelsea’s father raped her when he was attorney general of Arkansas.
Chelsea was responding to a story in the El Paso Times detailing the Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention of an illegal immigrant who had been detained after seeking a protective order in a domestic abuse case. In her tweet, Clnton tried unsubtly to refer to the Trump administration.
Here was Chelsea’s tweet from last Wednesday:
I need a thesaurus. What’s another word for horrifying? Sick? Awful? Running out of adjectives these days that mean unconscionably terrible https://t.co/jFs2istGbH
— Chelsea Clinton (@ChelseaClinton) February 16, 2017
Unmentioned in Chelsea’s remark was that the transgender “woman” in question, who had already been deported seven times before this, had a history of committing domestic violence, among a panoply of other offenses — illegal re-entry, larceny, assault, false imprisonment (no less than three times) and probation violations were among the laundry list of crimes listed by KVIA-TV.
While one can certainly question whether detaining an individual who was seeking a protective order — even a felon — creates perverse incentives, there’s no question that the “sick,” “awful” and “horrifying” things this individual had done meant “she” certainly should not have been in this country.
Also sick, awful and horrifying? Rape:
Well, since you asked, Here’s my definition of horrifying, sick & awful. Answer: Your father, Bill Clinton pic.twitter.com/UvpB64FP9P
— Juanita Broaddrick (@atensnut) February 17, 2017
Broaddrick, for those of you who don’t remember, is a former nursing home administrator who publicly accused then-President Bill Clinton in 1998 of raping her back in 1978, when he was actually in charge of criminal prosecutions in the Razorback state. The Clinton machine has long ignored Broaddrick and her allegations, even though she’s maintained her story for almost 20 years.
It’s worth pointing out that as a brave social media defender of sexual and/or domestic violence (provided, of course, there’s some sort of tenuous link to the man who beat her mother at the ballot box in November), Chelsea Clinton seems strangely silent when it comes to getting justice for Juanita Broaddrick. Or Kathleen Willey. Or Paula Jones. Or any of the women who have not only said but continued to maintain that they were the victims of sexual abuse at the hands of her father.
If Clinton fille is willing to address this multitude of accusations, I’m perfectly willing to consider her opinions on any sick, horrifying or awful thing she wishes to discourse on. Sans that, I would advise that she may just want to sit the next few years out.
Like us on Facebook – USA Liberty News
Please like and share on Facebook and Twitter with your thoughts on what Chelsea Clinton had to say.
What do you think about Juanita Broaddrick’s response? Scroll down to comment below!
H/T The Daily Caller